Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of Churd vehicle.

On August 13, 2014, around 20:35, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol to the private distance of the new bank from the right to demand the way ahead of the “E” located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Western-si, Western-si.

At the time, it is night and where there are many vehicles, so in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the front door and to prevent the accident by properly manipulating the steering and steering devices.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in neglecting it, and failed to properly operate the steering and steering devices, caused the Defendant to have the right side part of the G K5 car driven by the victim F, who was under way in the front direction of the Defendant’s driving, to be the front part of the car driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence above, destroyed the K5 car to be 460,000 won for repair costs, but did not immediately stop the car and take necessary measures, such as aiding the casualties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to F;

1. Entry of each traffic accident report;

1. A statement in a written estimate;

1. Application of the statutes on the site, road photographs, photographs of damaged vehicles, and motion picture photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that it is disadvantageous for the defendant to take necessary measures because he/she did not immediately pay a hidden device despite having caused a traffic accident.

However, the defendant.