1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,00,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from July 21, 2017 to June 14, 2019.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a person living together with D, the chairperson of C&A.

B. The Defendant, around January 22, 2016, connected the article of the title “F” of the news “F” in the United States of America to E AD G and tried to remove the article “1910 A 1910 A Hah Hahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

(n) D has a significantly high answer, i.e., a mother and child;

Around June 23, 2017, a summary indictment was submitted to the trial (Seoul Eastern District Court 2017No. 2661) on the grounds that he/she had damaged the reputation of the plaintiff by posting a false statement on the plaintiff, such as the attached list 1, on seven occasions in total.

C. On November 28, 2018, the above court acknowledged that the Defendant’s reputation was damaged by revealing openly false information for the purpose of slandering the Plaintiff.

B. A judgment of conviction of a fine of KRW 3,000,000 was rendered for the crime of violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation).

The above judgment became final and conclusive on December 6, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 13, the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff is liable for damages caused by tort on the grounds that the Defendant written and posted comments on each of the comments listed in the attached Forms 1 and 2, insulting the Plaintiff, and damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation.

In regard to this, the defendant argues that the comments written by the defendant are not false or false, or that the defendant did not have any awareness of falsity, and that the content of the comments written and posted by the defendant was about public matters, and that the comments written and posted by the defendant did not constitute tort, and that the comments written in attached Form 2 did not contain any fact that the defendant written and posted.

B. In a civil trial on the occurrence of one liability for damages, the same factual basis is the same even if it is not bound by the finding of facts in a criminal trial.