1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The defendant of the claim shall make the plaintiff 21,718.

1. Facts of recognition;

(a) 1) project approval and public announcement - project name: Urban planning facility project (B project; hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”);

-Public Notice: Notice C of March 15, 2012, and Notice D of April 6, 2012 - Decision of expropriation by August 20, 2012 at the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal of Gyeonggi-do (Defendant 2: Decision of expropriation by August 20, 2012: It is as shown in the column for expropriation of the compensation details list as shown in Attached Table 1.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant land and obstacles” - Compensation commencement date: 133,823,50 won - Compensation commencement date: The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on December 14, 2012, as indicated in the column for column for the amount of compensation indicated in attached Table 1: (b) the division, etc. of the instant land is as indicated in attached Table 1. (1) The Plaintiff cultivated the instant land as farmland owned by Gwangju City FF, G, H, I, and J (hereinafter referred to as “total land”) as farmland and installed fences at the boundary of the entire land in order to prevent the passage of neighboring residents without permission.

2) According to the Defendant’s implementation of the “Bongju-si Q village access road construction”, part of the entire land (R, S, T, U,O, P), and pents were expropriated by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on June 11, 2012. 3). Accordingly, according to the Defendant’s implementation of the instant project, the instant land and pents, etc. were expropriated by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on August 20, 2012 (hereinafter “Seoul land before subdivision”). The expropriated was part of the pents installed on the boundary of the entire land, which was installed between G land before subdivision and adjacent land (V,W, and X) (hereinafter “former pents”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Gap evidence 15, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff within the scope of the judgment of this court is in the first instance trial against the defendant, and ① in the appraisal of objection against the land of this case.