1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part shall be dismissed.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Police officers belonging to the Jinju Police Station, and CIC members of the Jinju District Information Bureau affiliated with the Information Bureau of the Korea Army headquarters in the Jinju District, were transferred approximately 1,200 inmates, who were detained in Jinju-si in connection with the following activities, and approximately 1,200 National Assembly members, from July 1950 to the police officers of the same month during the period from July 1950, to the Jinju-si's Haakter, for the Jinju-si's first half of July, 1950, to the Jinju-si's Yan asbestos outstanding side, the bendle, the bendle, the CIC members of the Korea Army Headquarters in the Jinju District, and the group, after they were transferred to the Jinju-si's upper part of the Jin

(hereinafter the above case is referred to as “sacrificing a prisoner in the Jinju District”). B.

1) The Framework Act on the Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on Settlement of History") shall apply to the Act on Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation.

(2) The Committee on the Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation established under the Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Committee on Settlement of History”).

(2) From around February 18, 2005 to around 2006, the court received an application to verify the truth of the case from the bereaved family members of the victim of the case where the Defendant was killed in the line of duty and conducted an investigation into the applicant, witness, and on-site investigation. On September 25, 2008, the court conducted an ex officio investigation into the Plaintiff, who is the bereaved family members of the network B who did not request the truth-finding investigation. (2) On February 18, 2009, the court conducted a fact-finding investigation into the case where the Defendant was killed in the line of duty, under the name of “the case where the Defendant was killed in the line of duty in the area where the Si/Gun/Gu was killed in the line of duty,” and confirmed the deceased B as the victim of the truth-finding investigation.

C. Around the time when the deceased B such as inheritance relationship, there was the Plaintiff, who was wife C and son, as the bereaved family members of the deceased B, and thereafter C died on December 25, 1980, and the Plaintiff inherited the deceased C solely.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap 1 through 3, and 5 (including each number in case of additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Establishment of liability for damages;

(a) a Party;