1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 21,33,33 of each of the Plaintiffs and its related KRW 15% per annum from November 20, 2018 to May 31, 2019; and (b) on January 20, 2019.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The former Commission Decision 1 of the Commission for the Settlement of History for the Truth and Reconciliation 1) caused the incident of genocide 43, which was detained in the Daejeon District of Daejeon District of the War, the incident of collectively murdered by the CICIC, the second Class Military Police Team, the Daejeon District of the Daejeon District of the Daejeon District of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea from June 28, 1950 to July 17, 1950 of the members of the Reporting Council, who were detained in the preliminary autopsy in the Daejeon District of the Daejeon District of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the North

(2) 2) The Committee on the Settlement of History for the Truth and Reconciliation established pursuant to the Framework Act on the Settlement of History for the Truth and Reconciliation of the Truth (hereinafter “Settlement Committee”) is written at H on June 22, 2010 as networkF G students and convict lists on the end of the investigation upon receipt of an application for the clarification of truth from the persons related to the persons who have made the sacrifices of the Daejeon War (date of the decision of correction).

36 persons, including Section B, who were involved in Jeju 4.3 Cases and were involved in such Jeju 4.3 Cases from July 2, 1949

7. Until April, 197, a sentence of seven years was sentenced to each of the seven-year penalties, and was sentenced to the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office. A decision was made to establish the truth of confirming the fact of murdering without legal procedure as a case of sacrifice of the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office.

In this case, the bereaved family members did not request the Court to find the truth as to the net F, and the Court ex officio conducted a truth-finding decision, and notified I of the fact to the bereaved family members.

B. The plaintiffs are children of F’s family relationship, and there are the J (K birth, the death of November 10, 201), the spouse of which is the heir at the time of F’s death (K birth, the death of November 10, 201), I (Inheritance of Family) and the plaintiffs who are married.

C. In relation to the damages compensation case of F’s partial bereaved family members, F’s son, who was the birth of F’s son, together with the bereaved family members of other victims, the Defendant on June 18, 2013.