logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.04.16 2012고단4314
업무상배임
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of eight million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A In March 2010, the victim D’s business activities related to E products and the management of information (transaction, purchase price, and sales price) necessary therefor, such as selling eco-friendly renewable energy-producing machinery that produces processed solid fuels, which is an eco-friendly renewable energy-generating machine, etc., by entering the victim D’s “E” as a business director, and manufacturing and selling waste vinyl produced and sold by the said company, and retired around August 2010. Defendant B entered the above E as the main agent in April 2010, and entered the above company in April 2010, and was retired from the company around August 2010, and was in charge of public relations activities related to E products and management of information (transaction, purchase, unit price, design drawings) necessary therefor.

The “RPF Machinery” of the above E undergoes several errors by investing approximately KRW 300 million in the cost of the said E, by supplying and returning machinery manufactured after designing, etc., throughout the three-month period. Since the pertinent design drawings, information files of the supplier and subcontractor, the supply price of the products, and the business related data have been kept and managed separately, the Defendants, who managed the documents related to the design drawings, business-related transaction information and delivery cost, shall not naturally take them out and use them against the interest of the victim under the principle of employment relationship or good faith, and at the time of retirement, they have a duty to return or discard them to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, as seen above, had been in the management of the RPF design drawings, etc. of the “RPF” in the above E, used them to set the machinery as made from the above E and sold it to the said customer.

According to the above conspiracys, the Defendants, at around August 2010, retired from the above E, and are obligated to perform their duties.

arrow