beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 1,460,000 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from November 16, 2017 to December 14, 2017.
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff asserted by the parties, from June 2, 2015 to April 22, 2016, the Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 4,700,000, which was exempted by the Plaintiff, and the remainder of KRW 5,140,00, which was deducted by the Defendant, from the amount of KRW 34,350,000 used by the entertainment tavern that the Plaintiff was working at his/her bar, and the amount of KRW 24,510,00 that was paid by the Defendant.
In regard to this, the defendant asserts that the service user fee is 28,270,000 won in total, and 2,000,000 won was exempted by the plaintiff, and the defendant paid 24,810,000 won, and the remaining 1,460,00 won was claimed excessively, so there is no obligation to pay it.
2. Determination
A. The facts of recognition (1) The Defendant is from June 19, 2015 to the same year from the entertainment tavern (hereinafter “instant business store”) under the trade name “D” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, where the Plaintiff works as nidozer (hereinafter “D”).
8. up to nine times until 28.25,700,000 services were used in total.
(2) From the end of August 2015, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a Kakao Kakao Stockholm message containing the following terms: “On June 8, 2015, from June 31, 257 to June 25.” “2.7 million to June 2.3 million to June 31, 2015, the liquor tax shall be paid at KRW 2.3 million”; and on September 15, 2015, the Plaintiff sent to the Plaintiff a Kakao Kao Stockholm message stating “IE, 2300.”
(3) On October 29, 2015, the Defendant used 2,000,000 won services from the instant store. On December 21, 2015, the Plaintiff sent an invoice to the Defendant on December 21, 2015, and sent it to the Defendant with a photograph, and “Isokao Stockholm message containing 10,000,00 won, which is not calculated as shacked by dracks. 29.”
(4) On December 23, 2015, the Defendant remitted KRW 20,000 to the Plaintiff. On the following day, the Plaintiff sent the Kakakao Stockholm message with the content that “500 is required to send at any time,” and the Defendant sent the 1.5 million won to the Plaintiff at any time. The Plaintiff sent the Kakao Stockholm message with the content that “the 5,000 won will die.” The Defendant sent the 1,500,000 won to the 1.5 million won.