1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. From January 2014, the Defendant had been married and married.

B. From October 2014, the Plaintiff entered into an inhumane relationship with C by providing a teaching system with C, etc.

C. On December 29, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant known of the unknownness of the Plaintiff and C, “1. The Plaintiff recognized the adultery and, accordingly, paid the Defendant a consolation money of KRW 100 million within five years.”

2. When the above conditions are established, the defendant shall not give any person around whom the content relating to C is related to the plaintiff, including his family.

3. The plaintiff does not express any matter related to the defendant to South Korea, and if this is not observed, the item 2 shall lose its effect.

was issued with a letter "......"

On January 10, 2018, the Defendant sent the Kakao Stockholm message to the Plaintiff, demanding the payment of KRW 100 million on the ground that the relationship with the Plaintiff and C was not properly arranged. On January 11, 2018, the Defendant sent the said message to the Plaintiff.

The Kakao Stockholm message was sent to the effect that each written statement is required to be notarized.

E. On January 12, 2015, the Plaintiff sent a message to the effect that: (a) the Defendant and C were sent to the Kakakao Stockholm’s group conference; (b) the Plaintiff consulted with the attorney for long time; (c) the agreed amount was KRW 30 million; and (d) he/she was sent to the lawsuit, if he/she was sent to the lawsuit, he/she would make his/her best to respond; and (c) the possible response was a way to file a complaint or a complaint.

Accordingly, the Defendant sent a message to the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff did not agree on KRW 210 million in total, including KRW 180,000,000,000,000, which is the estimated annual salary for the three-year period of the Plaintiff’s three-year period.

F. 1 The Plaintiff is the Defendant on January 15, 2015.

The purport is that the amount and time limit that can be actually paid is within two years with respect to sending the message to the same purport and mentioning his economic situation.