Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant of the 2017 Highly 1292, May 8, 2011, at the instant coffee shop located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, for the victim F. The Defendant had a dispute with the victim first.

The phrase “the amount of KRW 10,000,000 shall be paid in advance to female employees who are to pay the money.”

However, the defendant did not intend to receive 10 million won from the injured party as the advance payment.

Nevertheless, on May 8, 2011, Defendant 1 received 10 million won from the victim’s false statement from the victim to the post office account (Account Number: H) account in the name of the Defendant from the victim and acquired it by defrauded.

On September 9, 2011, the Defendant, “2017 High 1294, the Defendant, in the residence of the victimJ located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and even if having borrowed money from the victim, the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to repay the money, was paid as if he were to repay the money in a normal manner, and the Defendant, “The Defendant shall pay the money borrowed from another person, and the victim shall pay the money borrowed from the other person to the other person, and shall lend the money to the other person to the Seoul.” As such, the Defendant, who is believed to be true, acquired the money by forcing the damaged person, who is the creditor of the Defendant, to remit KRW 3 million to K.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 High 1292"

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A list of records 2017, 1292, 2017, 1292, 1292, 2017, 300, 1294;

1. Legal statement by the witness J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing written opinions of 2017, 1294, 2017, 1294, 2017

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is to the extent that the defendant borrowed money from the victims or received money in advance and then tried to change sexual traffic.