logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.08.23 2017고정1291
자동차관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2017 High 1291" is the owner of B Poter cargo.

Although a person who owns a motor vehicle undergoes a regular motor vehicle inspection on a regular basis for a certain period after new registration, the defendant failed to undergo a regular inspection by June 20, 2014, which is the expiration date of the term of validity of a regular inspection, and the head of the Busan Metropolitan City Dong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, issued an order to undergo a regular inspection of the motor vehicle, but failed to undergo it by June 30, 2016.

The defendant of "2017 High 1292" is the owner of CKaren vehicle.

Although a person who owns a motor vehicle undergoes a regular inspection on a regular basis for a certain period after new registration, the defendant did not undergo a regular inspection by October 1, 2013, which is the expiration date of the term of validity of a regular inspection and did not receive an order to undergo a regular inspection from the head of the Busan Metropolitan City Dong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City by June 7, 2016, even though he/she received an order to undergo a regular inspection by June 30, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 High Court Decision 1291]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Original Register of Motor Vehicle Registration (2017 High Court Decision 1292);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the motor vehicle registration ledger, inspection history, and statutes governing postal delivery status;

1. Article 81 subparagraph 22 of the Motor Vehicle Management Act and Article 37 (1) 3 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow