logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.02.12 2014고단2925
아동복지법위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On December 29, 2013, from around 20:00 to around 20:50, the Defendant violated the Child Welfare Act: (a) at the “F restaurant” located in Dong-gu, Ulsan-si; (b) at the children’s play room installed therein, the Defendant reported the victim G (five years of age) to another son; and (c) led the victim to be rashed and sat down the victim to be sat down immediately and sat down the victim; and (d) at the same time, the Defendant sent the victim’s sat and clothes to sat down the victim’s sat and sat down the part of the victim’s sat one time with the hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed abusive acts such as sexual harassment and sexual assault that cause a sense of sexual shame to children.

B. At around 20:52 on December 29, 2013, the injured Defendant: (a) stated that the victim B(34 years of age) committed the above act with the victim’s son, “I must go to her own seat; and (b) discussed the Defendant’s demand for death with respect to the demand of the victim; (c) did so in both hands; and (d) caused the Defendant’s injury on the part of the blue part of the blue part of the blue part of the blue part of the blue part of the blue part of the blue part of the blue part of the victim, which requires treatment for about 14 days.

2. Defendant B’s Defendant 1-B

The date, time, place, such as paragraph (1), and the victim A (37 years of age) shall be the child of the above G.

In order for the victim to take care of about 35 days of internal walls to be treated, spawn complete spawn, spawn, and spawn because of the fact that the victim was forced to do the same act but did not go to the death, the victim was injured by the mouth of internal walls, spawn complete spawn, and spawn spawn that require the victim to be treated.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Prosecutorial suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The police of H. H.

arrow