1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The following contents are added between the 4th 6th 6 and 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the accident of this case occurred since the negligence, such as the Plaintiff's safe response, etc. after the occurrence of pains by video, etc., the defendant's liability should be limited in consideration of the above plaintiff's negligence. The evidence submitted by the defendant alone is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's negligence, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not acceptable. Accordingly, the 6th 19th 5th "(4,074,525 won)" added "(4,525 won)" to 35,175,68 won(25,534,988 won, 90,700 won, 450,500 won, 500 won, 500 won, 4050 won, 507 won, 4050 won, 507 won, 407 won, 507.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim should be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder should be dismissed as there is no reasonable ground.

In conclusion, the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the above recognition amount among the judgment of the first instance which partially differed from this conclusion is unfair, and thus, the defendant's appeal is partially accepted and revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part is dismissed, and the remaining appeal