logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.07.05 2018누41817
체류기간연장등불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The court's explanation about this case is identical to the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance other than the part concerning this case as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second sentence of the first instance judgment, the second and the second sentence of the first instance judgment, and the second half of the second and the second sentence of the second, "the former Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 201)" shall be amended to "the former Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 21942, Dec. 31, 2009)".

The second sentence of the first instance judgment was amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 201, and amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 201.

Part 7 of the judgment of the first instance shall be subject to "Article 10 (1)" in Part 2 of the judgment of the second instance as "Article 10 (1)."

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow