A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2014 Highest 4031" was a person who operated a travel house with the trade name of "D" in Daejeon Sung-gu C Building 1417, and the victim E was aware of it through the victim E around 2009.

On July 18, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement by phone call to the victim stating, “The settlement amount of the right to air tickets from a group overseas travel team need to be paid in advance. If the money is lent to another place, the Defendant would promptly return the money deposited in another place.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he will not return the existing debt with the money borrowed from the victim, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay it.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and is next to the date under the pretext of the loan from the victim.

7. 19. 19. 20 million won in the account designated by the Defendant, 5 million won in the same way on the 30th of the same month, 4.5 million won in the same way on February 9, 201, 7 million won in the same way on the 23th of the same month, and the same year.

3. 28. 12 million won by the same method, and the same year.

8.7. It received, in the same way, KRW 5 million in total, KRW 5 million and KRW 58.5 million in the same manner on the 11th of the same month.

"2015 Highest 2075"

1. On January 13, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim H at the G Office of Co., Ltd., Ltd., the Defendant operated the Seo-gu Daejeon Building 104, Seo-gu, Daejeon, stating that “I will not refund travel expenses, but make it difficult for the Defendant to pay them not later than 4 hours, while I will not travel. If I would like to request the father to lend money, even if I would like to lend money. I will pay the interest after one week.”

However, in fact, the defendant is not obliged to pay additional tax of KRW 14 million because he did not receive operating income, and even if he borrowed money from the victim due to the fact that he has already been liable for the debt to I et al. and has already been operating in the form of prompt return.