logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.07.16 2015고단492
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around January 10, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D that he/she would pay back money if he/she lends his/her children's study funds, etc. to the victim D.

However, the Defendant, at the time, was liable for the amount equivalent to KRW 2 billion, and was paying other debts by the so-called “domination” method, so there was no intention or ability to repay the said debt even if the Defendant borrowed the said money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received a total of KRW 50 million from the victim to November 30, 201, including the receipt of KRW 5 million from the victim on the same day, and received a total of KRW 58 million from November 30, 201, as shown in the annexed crime list.

"2015 Highest 616"

1. On June 2009, the criminal defendant against the victim E made a false statement to the victim E that he/she would have repaid the amount within one month if he/she lent money to the victim E as he/she is urgently required to pay capital gains tax and store operation expenses. If the money does not accrue, he/she would have to leave the building as collateral to the f who will return the money to the f who will return it even if he/she lends the money to the f who will return it.

However, in fact, the Defendant, at the time, was liable for the debt amounting to KRW 2 billion, and the Defendant paid other debt by means of so-called return prevention, and there was no intention or ability to pay the debt even if he borrowed money from the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 30,01,420 on the 25th day of the same month from the victim, and transferred KRW 30,01,420 on the 30th day of the same month to the Agricultural Cooperative (G) account under the name of the Defendant, and had the Defendant pay KRW 43,40,000 on the 30th day of the same month, thereby

2. The Defendant’s fraud against the Victim H is at the victim H’s store located in the Hanam-si around November 201, 201, and “Non.”

arrow