A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

700,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On August 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on the ground that he/she was sentenced to eight months, and the Seoul Northern District Court terminated the execution of the sentence on January 6, 2017.

A person other than a person handling narcotics, etc. shall not possess, possess, use, transport, manage, import, export, manufacture, prepare, administer, administer, give or receive, trade, assist in trade of, or provide narcotics or psychotropic drugs.

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On January 16, 2017, around 09:00, the Defendant was issued 400,000 won in cash in return for the following: (a) No. 608 of the “D” hotel in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “D”); and (b) Meteptoptophs, which are local mental drugs contained in transparent microphones (hereinafter “phiphones”); and (c) 0.5g of Meptophs (hereinafter “diphones”).

Accordingly, although the defendant is not a narcotics handler, he purchased and sold phiphones.

2. Medication;

A. On January 15, 2017, at around 23:10, the Defendant placed 0.1g of the penphone 0.7g, purchased from the Defendant’s house located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, into a single-use diversing 0.1g of the penphone 0.7g, into a single-use diversing divers, and injected into his left part of the blood.

B. On March 6, 2017, the Defendant put the Defendant’s house located in Bucheon-si H into a single-use 0.05g of philopon, which remains after being administered as described in paragraph 2-A, into a single-use diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary diversary dives, and injected into one’s left part of the blood cells.

(c)

On March 31, 2017, at around 22:00, the Defendant administered 0.05g opphones in the same manner as the Defendant’s home described in paragraph 2(b) at around 22:0.

Therefore, although the defendant is not a narcotics handler, he administered philophones over three times in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The protocol of suspect interrogation of each police officer regarding E;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. The place where a simple test result is found;

1. Report on the result of the preliminary test of narcotics;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: