logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.12.17 2014고단9117
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 2, 2014, the Defendant was arrested by the police who used to take a bath to neighboring residents C, and received a report from D and E, and was investigated. On August 1, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for the crime of assault in Busan District Court's Dong Branch Branch Branch, and was issued to C.

1. On September 27, 2014, around 10:30 on September 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) divided the first race in front of the Victim C’s house F 201, Suwon-gu, Busan; and (b) opened the entrance door to the ward through the entrance door against the victim’s will in order to confirm who is the victim.

2. On September 27, 2014, at around 11:10, the Defendant: (a) 11:10 of the aforesaid F. F. The Defendant was asked from the police officer assigned to the Busan Coastal Police Station G police box and the victim slope I (the age 42) about the circumstances of the instant case, etc. on the following grounds: (b) the Defendant took a humping to the view that “the head of the police officer, who was arrested as an offender in the act of obstruction of the performance of official duties by the police officer and called “the head of the police station, who was on the duty of the police officer, was shot, who was frighted under the direction of the police officer, and who was frighted to the right hand of the H, who was pushed into the act of obstruction of the performance of official duties by the police officer, and was arrested by the police officer, and was escorted to the victim’s port by asking the victim’s back one time to the back of the head of the H, who was on the front patrol.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of duties on handling reports and criminal investigations, and at the same time, failed to identify the number of medical treatment days to the victim I.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to C, H, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports;

1. In regard to the crime, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act as to the crime.

arrow