A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 03:30 on August 27, 2014, the Defendant, at the entrance of the main station located in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (a) assaulted E, a main employee; and (b) f, upon receiving a report, attempted to arrest the Defendant on the charge of assaulting the said E; and (c) f, upon receiving a report, tried to arrest the Defendant on the commission of committing an act of assaulting the said E, the Defendant f., who was heard by the said E, she f., sent the victim f., who was the police f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., “

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. On August 27, 2014, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender as above, and around 04:50 on August 27, 2014, the Defendant opened the luminous Police Station in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the office for duty keeping in the office for the police station and the office for duty keeping in the jurisdiction of the Gwangjin-gu Police Station G District Unit of the Minejin Police Station: (a) when the Gyeongjin Police Station in order for the Defendant to hand over the Defendant to the police station, the Defendant asked him/herself whether he/she sawbucks that

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the above police officers' defense and transfer of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Each statement of H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to victim H standing photographs, ctv-faging photographs, investigation reports (Hearing of shots’ statements);

1. Articles 136 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is committed on the grounds of suspended sentence, and the defendant takes a bath to the police officer dispatched after receiving a report that the defendant assaulted him at the main point, and is a crime obstructing the performance of official duties by assaulting him/her, and is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, the defendant is recognized to commit a crime and divided, the defendant has no criminal records of probation or more, and the victim is treated due to the personality mental disorders.