logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.03.28 2018고단3591
강제추행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the president of the defendant, who is an incorporated association, and the victim C (tentative name, inn) was known to each other as a companion animal petator.

On March 2016, 2016, the Defendant introduced a person who is able to borrow money from the victim in the vicinity of the E Station located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, to enter the Defendant’s home by having the victim go together with the victim in the direction of the Defendant’s residence located in the Dong-gu, Daejeon. On March 2, 2016, the Defendant got the victim into the Defendant’s home by having the victim go together with the victim in the direction of the Defendant’s residence located in the Dong-gu, Daejeon.

The defendant, within the above dwelling place, called "at the time of shooting, they can be cut off so far as they can be cut off," and the defendant, after the victim's back, taken the shoulder of the victim by hand, and cut the victim's hand by cutting the victim's hand into the victim's inner part, and set the her breasts into both hands.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by C in the second protocol of the trial;

1. The entry of witnesses G and H in the third protocol of trial;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning C (tentative name);

1. On March 11, 2016, the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that: (a) there is no space between the Defendant and the Defendant’s house in the first patrol officer on March 2016, 2016, along with the criminal facts indicated in the Defendant’s judgment; and (b) the Defendant’s awareness of the victim’s shoulder around May 2016 does not constitute an indecent act against the victim, such as facts or facts stated in the judgment.

According to each of the above evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the victim has made a consistent and concrete statement in the investigative agency and this court on the crime of this case, its previous and subsequent circumstances.

arrow