logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.02.15 2016고단1151
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 on September 21, 2016, within the D convenience store operated by the Victim C in Jinju-si; (b) the Defendant: (c) caused smoking to be prevented from smoking; and (d) took a bath to the victim; and (c) continued to have his carded.

It interfered with the victim's convenience store business for about 20 minutes by force, such as continuing the above convenience store, spreading the bath, and allowing three customers who visited the place to buy goods at uneasiness, leaving the place, etc., and allowing them to do so.

2. On September 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) voluntarily accompanied the police officer of the Jinju Police Station F District in Jinju-si, Jinju-si on the ground that he interfered with the above convenience store business, as described in paragraph (1) above; (b) voluntarily urged the Defendant to return home to the Defendant, and (c) led the police officer who met the said police officer to move back to the Defendant, and (d) led the Defendant to a very rough and disorderly behavior in the above district located within the 20-minute government office, which is a government office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of interference with business), and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant, under the influence of alcohol, has obstructed the business of convenience stores and has committed an act of disturbance even after voluntary accompanying to the district, and the nature of the crime is not good. However, the defendant reflects his/her crime, the defendant has reached an agreement with the victim interfering with his/her business, and there has been no criminal history during the last five years, and there is no history of punishment for the sentence.

arrow