logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.02.13 2017고단1410
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Force” The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on February 2, 2017 by the Seoul Northern District Court on the grounds of obstructing the performance of official duties and obstructing business operations, etc., and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on February 10, 2017, and is currently under the suspended sentence.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On March 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 04:50 on March 21, 2017, the Defendant: (b) deemed the victim D in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to have worked at the convenience shop in front of the E-mail, while under the influence of alcohol; (c) took a bath without any justifiable reason; and (d) for customers who use the above convenience store.

Does Monara, Pesta et al.

“Around 50 minutes of the instant convenience store due to sound, etc., the victim’s convenience store operation was obstructed by force against those who breath or passed the alcohol in front of the said convenience store by means of raising time fees, etc.

2. On March 21, 2017, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was arrested on a flagrant offender on the grounds as above; (b) whether the police officials working there in the G District located in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Central District would be off of the national clothes of the people who were in Grade B above, and then were arrested.

A police officer was unable to avoid disturbance due to words and actions conducted by the government offices, such as the voice that the police officer was off of clothes and boomed, that he was boomed, that he died of Nos. 298, and that he will die in water.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal testimony of witness D, H and I;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A written statement of the main officer;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment to two CDs, including attachment of cell phone images taken by the police officer in charge of the sending police officer;

1. Previous records: The results of inquiry and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal investigation reports (report on attachment of judgment related to the same kind of crime by the suspect);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of interference with business), and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

arrow