A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from October 201 to October 2012, 201, was a business employee in the E operated by the victim D in Busan City from around 2011 to around 2012, and was engaged in the sale and collection of the above E’s joint market.

1. Occupational embezzlement;

A. On September 20, 2012, the Defendant collected KRW 500,000 from G in Daegu North Korea-gu, and embezzled the victim’s property at will using the same method in the same manner as indicated in the list of crimes in the following: (a) around that time, the Defendant arbitrarily used the amount of KRW 12,560,000 in total for personal purposes, such as repayment of debts, from Daegu Japan-gu, and embezzled the victim’s property.

B. Around September 14, 2012, the Defendant received orders as if the orders were made in I, even though the orders were made by H and the orders were received from H.

After that, the Defendant provided a joint board to H, and collected KRW 1,230,500 from the price of the goods, and embezzled the victim’s property at will for personal purposes, such as repayment of debt, etc. from the Daegu-si Seoul Special Metropolitan City Council.

C. The Defendant is above E around October 12, 2012.

In the same manner as described in the paragraph, the victim's property was embezzled by arbitrarily using the victim's property for personal purposes, such as repayment of debt, etc., from the Daegu-si District Court around that time, which provided a joint board to H and collected 328,000 won for the goods.

2. Around July 19, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would have repaid the victim with the intent to pay the amount, i.e., “on the face of the need for the payment of the amount.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money from the victim because he did not have any obligation such as financial institution's debt 15 million won and bond 12 million won.

The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim and deceiving him from the victim on the same day, is an enterprise bank under the name of the Defendant.