A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from October 2008 to September 201, 201, carried out the interest as an employee of the victim C’s operation D in Si interest cities from October 2008 to September 201.

1. The Defendant, through the release of products, borrowed approximately KRW 14 million from F, which is the actual operator of the victim’s business, who was the actual operator of (E)E, and, in order to pay the amount, went into the order from F, the said State E to pay the amount of KRW 14 million, he was willing to pay the victim’s debt by additional supply of the goods owned by the victim.

Accordingly, around December 3, 2008, the Defendant consumed one of the mid-term employees with a market value of KRW 90,000 on behalf of the victim company by arbitrarily supplying it to the (ju) E and omitting entry in the sales ledger of the victim company.

In addition, from around that time to April 13, 201, the Defendant: (a) arbitrarily supplied the victim’s interest in a total of 25 times in the same manner at the same place as shown in Appendix I, and subsequently consumed the sales slip by omitting the entry in the sales slip or deleting the sales slip after delivery.

As a result, the defendant embezzled the property of the victim who was in custody on duty.

2. Around December 3, 2010, the Defendant, through the receipt of goods payment, received money from the same household, a customer of the victim company, from the same household, to the account of G’s national bank account, which is one’s own seat, and used money for the victim company for the business of receiving KRW 1.5 million for the victim company. Around that time, the Defendant used money for an individual purpose, such as entertainment expenses, in a day-to-day society where entertainment was conducted.

The Defendant, from around that time to February 16, 201, from around that time, throughout the same eight times in total as shown in the attached Table II, was prohibited from paying off the sum of the price for supplying the chairs stored in his/her business for the victim company, as shown in the attached Table II. 11,792.