logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 07. 25. 선고 2018다241533 판결
추심행위가 적법한지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Incheon District Court-2018-B-51686 (2018.06.01)

Title

Whether a collection act is legitimate

Summary

If the chief of a tax office subrogated the creditor by notifying the obligor of the attachment, he shall regard that the director of the tax office acquires the right to collect the claim.

Related statutes

Article 41 of the National Tax Collection Act

Cases

2018Da241533 Collection Money

Plaintiff-Appellee

Korea

Defendant-Appellant

○○ Unemployment Co., Ltd.

Judgment of the lower court

2018.06.01

Imposition of Judgment

2018.25

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

No ground of appeal is stated in the petition of appeal filed by appellant, and the appellate brief is filed within the statutory period.

As such, Article 429 of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 5 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Trial at Trial

It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow