1. The Defendant’s KRW 40,000,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual interest thereon from January 1, 2010 to September 22, 2014.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

(a) The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4 (including branch numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply).

1) On February 4, 2006, the Defendant affixed a seal to each of the following documents. (A) The Defendant sold the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s (hereinafter “Supplementary Intervenor”) the right to purchase eight (8) square meters in the cost of living countermeasure (commercial paper) related to the Housing Site Development in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si (hereinafter “the instant land”), which is owned by the Defendant, to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s right to purchase the land D and E (F) (hereinafter “the instant land”). The Defendant stated that “if the Defendant fails to perform his/her contractual obligation, he/she shall pay two (2) times penalty of promissory notes drawn up on the date on which the Intervenor’s request is made” (Article 7) with the content that “if the Defendant becomes aware of rights due to failure to meet the standards for the establishment of the livelihood of the land construction works, it shall be deemed that the Intervenor would compensate the Intervenor for penalty as stipulated in Article 7,” and that a promissory note is added to the Defendant’s issuance of the above promissory note.

3) Since the Defendant did not fall under the requirements for the supply of the land for livelihood countermeasures, the land for livelihood countermeasures was not supplied. 4) On July 14, 2014, the auxiliary intervenor transferred to the Plaintiff a claim for a distribution of the purchase price and a damages for delay, which the Defendant had against the Defendant, and around that time, notified the Defendant of the transfer of the above claim.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant's judgment is based on the sales contract and the letter of performance dated February 4, 2006 to the plaintiff as to the land in this case.