beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2012 Highest 1037] On May 26, 2012, the Defendant came to know that the Defendant was able to see the victim C (n, 24 years of age) and the Defendant was able to see that he was able to see in the Eelel located in Gangseo-si, Gangseo-si, Gangwon-si, and that he was able to see the number of rooms in which the victim was able to see, even though she was able to see the victim before the above telecom, the Defendant refused to see and confirmed the number of rooms in which the victim was able to see by entering the telecom.
On May 27, 2012, the Defendant, around 00:46, 00, her fested the number of houses of the room in which the victim silentd to the principal of the above felher, and her furged as if the Defendant was a member of the victim, she received the keys from the said principal, and her furged 302, where the victim implied.
Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's room against the victim's will.
[2] No person shall make any codes, language, sound, image, or picture that arouses fear or apprehensions through an information and communications network to reach another person repeatedly.
Around July 2012, the Defendant reported that the victim F (n, 24 years old) posted an excessive advertisement, and set the victim’s phone number on July 27, 2012. Around 04:59, at the Defendant’s house located in Young-gun G and 2, Dong 501, the Defendant called the victim by using the Defendant’s cell phone, and walked the victim as the person who knows the victim, and the Defendant was able to do so, and the Defendant was called the victim as the victim. The Defendant was cut off. The Defendant was known of the flick-gun. The Defendant got off the flick-gun. The Defendant got off the flick-gun. The Defendant called the victim’s phone from around that time, to September 206, 2012, the Defendant entered the victim’s cell phone at the victim’s home, as indicated in [Attachment Table 5].