beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
With respect to interference with business affairs of the 2013 Highest 1499, "the public prosecution was revoked and the decision of dismissing the public prosecution was notified" on March 28, 2014.
1. At around 06:00 on October 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) received pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of KRW 10,000 from the Ecafeteria operated by the Victim D; and (b) as if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if he drinks and drinks, he did not pay the price, the Defendant ordered 7,000 won to the vertea Hashes and Hashes, and he did not pay KRW 3,000,000.
2. On October 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 14:20, at the above E-cafeteria; (b) as if he had no intent or ability to pay the price even if he drinks and drinks, the Defendant did not order the 6,000 won and the 3,000 won of the f, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount as the Defendant did not pay 9,000 won of the price.
3. On October 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 01:30, the fact at the H main point of the Victim G management of the Heung-gu Heungdong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju, that the Defendant was unable to pay the price even if he drinks and drinks; and (b) did not pay the price by ordering 15,000 won as if he had no intent or ability to pay the price, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to that amount.
around May 10, 2013, the Defendant received an order of 4.20,000 won for two weeks, one illness, and one week, etc. from the “K” entertainment tavern where the victim J in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, is employed as an employee.
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even if he received the same as above, because there was no certain property or income at the time.
Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, did not pay only 100,000 won by deceiving the victim as the price and not pay the remainder, thereby avoiding the payment of 320,000 won, including acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.