A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 27, 2016, at around 18:45, the Defendant damaged property by using 10,000 square meters of 10,000 won at the risk of two trees owned by the victim D from around 18:45, around 2016 to the Defendant’s agricultural death.

2. Injury;

A. On May 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 07:58, around 07:58, on the ground that the said injured person was able to follow the reasons for the Defendant’s death of night trees; (b) 10 times the victim’s face face level on drinking; and (c) 2 weeks of diagnosis on the victim’s left upper part of the victim’s body, walking the victim’s back, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as kne, knee, and downcoming fel, etc.

B. The Defendant, at the time and place indicated in the above Paragraph 1, was based on the reason that the victim was able to grow well at the victim’s face at 4-5 times, strokeed the victim’s face, and strokeed the victim behind stroke, and suffered injury to the victim, by walking the victim’s left part of the victim’s face, resulting in the victim’s 6th left part of the diagnosis of the victim’s 4th left part of the diagnosis.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 257(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment for each of them;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [Judgment of the Defendant and his defense counsel] of the Criminal Act recognizes the fact that the Defendant and his defense counsel have 10 gys of trees at the risk of both the Defendant and his defense counsel. However, at the time, the Defendant, after harvesting a new net with utility, has taken two gys of trees at the risk of having no value of goods, and thus does not constitute damage.