logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.05.10 2012고단2243
무고
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 23, 2012, the Defendant presented a false statement to the public service center of the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office in Seocho-gu in Seocho-gu, Seoul, to the effect that “C, the Defendant, was present at the Seoul Central District Court 2006No. 6, Apr. 7, 2010 and the Defendant's defense counsel at the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office for the purpose of having the criminal punishment imposed upon C, stating that “A, the Defendant, who is the Defendant, testified as “for example,” the Defendant's defense counsel's “Although the ownership transfer registration of the instant land was made on April 7, 2010, there was no substantial ownership of the land (the instant land) but there was a dispute between F and E, and the Defendant or E does not actually have ownership of the land (the instant land) and submitted a false statement to the witness or F to the effect that it was punished for perjury.”

However, in fact, the ownership of the above land was in C or F, and the defendant was well aware of this fact.

As a result, the defendant was arrested for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the prosecution (including the part concerning the statement of the defendant);

1. Statement of the police statement of the defendant;

1. Complaints, Seoul Criminal District Court Decision 1991Kadan9362, Seoul Criminal District Court Decision 1992No3139, Seoul Criminal District Court Decision 2006No5504, Seoul District Court Decision 1997Kadan5504, Seoul District Court Decision 1998No180

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, has already ownership of the instant land and the housing on its ground, and is a civil criminal trial with F and C, etc. for a long time.

arrow