1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 27, 2012, at around 13:20, the vehicle C (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) driven by B (the age of 38 years at that time) was making a stop in the atmosphere on the front of the D market in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, and the Defendant’s insurable vehicle, who was making the vehicle behind, did not fulfill its duty of care, such as the time when the vehicle was set off on the front of the D market in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, thereby drilling

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

B around December 21, 2012, the E Hospital (hereinafter “Inbound Hospital”) visited the E Hospital located in Si interest on the ground of a hacker’s pain. At the same time, the E Hospital was issued a diagnosis of the injury of the hacker’s salt and tension on the hacker’s hacker and the hacker’s hacker’s hacker’s hacker and the hacker’s hacker’s hacker’s hacker.

In addition, B hospitalized in the non-party hospital on December 26, 2012, 1.26, 2012, 200. 1. 1. Then, B received an operation, such as an inception to the upper and upper chilling chilling and the upper chilling chilling and chilling chilling crank

C. B, as above, for a period from December 25, 2012 to 57, 2012, was hospitalized in a non-party hospital as a health insurance and received outpatient treatment. The costs of health care benefit accrued therefrom are total of KRW 4,401,430, and the Plaintiff’s charge calculated by deducting KRW 1,173,590 borne by B is KRW 3,227,840.

On April 17, 2013, the Defendant paid KRW 15 million (the hospital expenses shall be borne separately by the Defendant) to B as agreed money, and the Defendant issued a written agreement stating that “B shall not raise any objection in the future regarding the entirety of the legal damages (the suspension of business, medical expenses, consolation money, and other damages) due to the instant accident,” to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

E. Meanwhile, after the instant accident, the Defendant sent a medical advice to a doctor of F Hospital on the medical record B, and sent a reply to the effect that, around January 16, 2013, the injury that B suffered due to the instant accident was presumed to have been done on the “erode salt.”