The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant appears to have a favorable condition, such as the confession of the crime of this case and the expression of intention to treat narcotics addiction, etc. Since he voluntarily surrendered to the police on November 24, 2015 after the crime of this case, and most of the phiphones handled by the crime of this case were seized to an investigative agency. However, the crime of this case is discovered with the remaining phiphones (1.06g) after the Defendant administered phiphones over two times, it is necessary to strictly punish and eradicate the remaining phiphones when considering the addiction to narcotics, harm caused by medication of narcotics, etc. Since the defendant had no record of punishment six times or less for the same crime (including five times of actual punishment); the defendant had no record of imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime of this case; the defendant had no record of punishment for the same crime of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of 1 year or more; the defendant had no record of punishment for the same crime of this case of this case of punishment of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of 1 year.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not reasonable.