1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 1, 2003, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as C and a full-time lecturer at B University established by the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “Supplementary Intervenor”), and was promoted as an associate professor on April 1, 2004 as an associate professor on April 1, 2008, and was reappointed on September 1, 2010.

B. On May 4, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with B University for the public offering of research tasks in the year of 2010 with the following content:

'A' was concluded.

▣ 2010학년도 교내연구 공모과제 계약서

1. The name of the research task: D;

2. Term of contract: International academic areas registered in the research paper-international specialized research paper-international specialized research SCI, SCI, A&HI list from April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2012;

4. Contract amount: Five million won (five thousand won).

5. To pay Party A in full after deducting research expenses from taxes;

6. B shall submit to March 31, 2012 a report on results of the intra-school research project and the result of the final research project.

7. The full amount of the contract shall be recovered if the research report and the results of the research are not published, published, exhibited, or announced within the research period;

C. Around June 2010, B University paid KRW 5 million to the Plaintiff according to the instant public recruitment agreement. On April 2, 2012, the Plaintiff submitted to B University a result of the instant contract, stating that “D” (hereinafter “D”) was published on April 2, 2012 in the SCI International Professional Science Site E 110 pages E, 475 through 478.

On the other hand, as the term of appointment of the Plaintiff’s associate professor expires on August 31, 2012, B University on April 30, 2012 (including the Plaintiff) is the same year as the number of faculty members subject to examination for reappointment, including the Plaintiff, are subject to examination for reappointment and evaluation.

5. Until August 18, 201, the Plaintiff notified the primary evaluator (hereinafter “instant re-election”) that the thesis of this case should be reappointed on August 31, 2012, and the Plaintiff is the data to evaluate the achievements of re-appointing the thesis of this case to the primary evaluator (the president of the Korean Literature University).