1. Of the instant litigation, the part between the Plaintiff and Defendant National Railroad Corporation, and the Plaintiff Company B is on January 11, 2021.

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as stated in Paragraph 1 of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the partial completion or deletion as follows. Accordingly, this Court shall accept it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The portion of the Defendant Korea Railroad Facilities Corporation in the third place, the fourth place, the second place, and the fifth place of the judgment of the first instance court is each "Defendant Korea Railroad Corporation", and the third place of the third place of the work is each "contractor", and the third place of the work is each "contractor", and the third place of the work is "contractor".

Part III through VI of the judgment of the first instance court (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant B”) and the part of “Defendant C” through “Defendant C” through “Defendant C” are deleted.

2. Of the instant lawsuit, the judgment court on the part between the Plaintiff, the National Railroad Corporation, and the Defendant Korea Railroad Corporation may, ex officio, make a decision on recommending reconciliation for the fair resolution of the case, taking into account the parties’ interests and all other circumstances, to the extent that the case pending in the lawsuit does not conflict with the purport of the claim. In principle, the parties concerned may raise an objection against the decision within two weeks from the date of receiving the authentic copy of the written decision, and the parties concerned shall submit the objection to the court which made the decision of recommending reconciliation (see Articles 225, 226, 227 of the Civil Procedure Act). If no objection is raised within the above period, the decision of recommending reconciliation shall have the same effect as a judicial compromise, and if the objection is duly raised, the lawsuit shall return to the Plaintiff before the decision of recommending reconciliation is made (see Articles 231 and 232 of the Civil Procedure Act). The court shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 100,000 until February 26, 2021.

If Defendant C delays the payment of the above amount, 12% per annum for the unpaid amount to the Plaintiff from the day following the payment date to the day of full payment.