A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

From August 2014, the Defendant had been in the relationship between the victim (n, 56 years of age) and the related person.

1. On June 6, 2016, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim’s house located in Seocheon-si, Socheon-si, 2016, at around 22:30, the Defendant saw the victim’s horse from the victim’s horse, she saw the victim’s face and head by taking care of the victim’s horse in his/her hand, and suffered injury on the victim’s face and head by taking care of the victim’s hair, and caused the victim’s injury to the victim, such as brain, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. The defendant is at risk of being subject to criminal punishment due to the crime of injury by providing the police with a notification of the fact that the victim was assaulted as described in paragraph (1) by reporting the fact that the victim was assaulted as described in paragraph (1) and by providing a notification to the police, etc., and thus, he/she is able to raise the victim's religion and not to find out or contact the police officer

Even though the promise was committed, the victim was able to withdraw his belief.

On June 9, 2016, the Defendant found the victim as D's workplace located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Jungcheon-gu, Seoul around 09:30, sent the victim to an emergency stairs, and then the victim must not withdraw the complaint.

B. A fine of fine of 2 to 300, however, it shall be what we will see, and the death shall be discarded.

“.....”

Defendant continued to see the victim’s threat, and the Defendant’s report of emergency and location confirmation, which was paid by the police station, and the Defendant’s “I have been removed from the police station.”

It is reported to the police.

Definites shall be discarded.

There is a complaint against width in fraud.

D. The office is also supposed.

The term "the injured party" refers to "if the injured party does not withdraw the report, he/she threatened the injured party as if he/she would endanger the life and body of the injured party.

As a result, the defendant threatened the victim who provided investigation proviso on his criminal case with the aim of evading retaliation and reporting.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment]