Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for four years and for two years, respectively.

Defendants are filed with D, each applicant for compensation.

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highly 199]

1. The Defendants’ co-principal in collusion with the Defendants in a de facto marital relationship. Defendant B, around May 20, in a restaurant where it is impossible to know the trade name in the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the fact is difficult to guarantee conclusive profits due to the prediction of two kinds of foreign exchange exchange exchange exchange rates in the case of financial transactions that generate profits through the FX Maring and exchange profits. Defendant A, the husband of the above FXE transactions, was raising funds in the form of a tentatively called “flucing” due to the occurrence of damages, and even if she borrowed money from the victim F, without the intent or ability to repay the funds, he would pay 3% interest per month and return the principal to the victims at any time, and he shall receive 30 million won from the victim F and shall receive 30 million won on the same day and receive it from the victim F to 140 million won on the same day and shall receive it from 150 million won on the same day, 2015.

2. On October 21, 2010, Defendant A’s sole criminal conduct, at the Defendant’s FXM trading office located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on the following occasions: (a) on the false statement, Defendant A, despite having no intent or ability to repay money from the victim H, did not lend money to the victim H, thereby paying interest of 7% per month and returning the principal at any time if the principal would be returned; and (b) from that time, Defendant A received KRW 30 million from the victim H and acquired it by money from the victim H to April 15, 2012, as shown in the attached Table 2, 15 times in total, including the same method as shown in the attached Table 2.

[2013Gohap225]

3. Defendant B’s sole criminal conduct on October 201