Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 4,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the actual operator and publisher of the G newspaper company in Ansan-si, 305, the F building 305, and the defendant B was working as the director general of the Compilation of the above newspaper company from 2008 to May 8, 2012.

When the victim I, who is the H Day-based reporter, published an article on various issues, such as the operation of a display stand under the entrustment contract of the banner designated display stand concluded by the J corporation that Defendant A, which was the actual owner of the H Day, was Ansan-si, and the Defendants conspired to publish and distribute a false article as if the victim had a malicious appraisal and had a false article.

1. On November 22, 2011, the Defendants prepared an article stating that “The Defendants are suspected of false reports in a malicious and malicious manner to the JI reporter Co., Ltd., I and the Prosecutor’s Office. I indicate that the contents of the I reporter are illegal, and sell to the general public as if the J were to commit an illegal act, and thereby, the equivalent party should be kept up.” On November 24, 201, the Defendant prepared an article stating that the contents of the article reported on the issue, such as the operation of the display stand under the above entrustment contract with the time when the J Co., Ltd. concluded, and published and distributed it to the G Newspaper on November 24, 201.

However, the facts are that the victim reported about the issue to a variety of related parties, such as public officials in charge of Ansan-si, and the contents of the article, except for some expressions, are facts. Rather, the defendants did not go through the process of fact-finding, and they reported about the issue in bad faith to the victim by representing only the position of the JJ corporation of which the defendant A is a private state, without going through the fact-finding process.

Accordingly, the defendants are made public by the newspaper for the purpose of slandering the victim in collusion.