logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.04.07 2016고단13
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant had been working for the “D” restaurant in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do as a delivery employee, and maintained an inappropriate relationship with the victim by returning to the victim who was female from February 2013 and engaging in sexual intercourse with the victim. On September 2013, the Defendant continued to maintain internal relations with the victim even after having opened the above “D” restaurant.

During that period, the victim gets the defendant at his own home, for reasons such as the defendant's intervention in his own family affairs and the defendant's heart.

In case of frequent demand, the defendant taken a sexual intercourse with the victim, and used it to keep the relationship with the victim by threatening the victim.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Kameras and other crimes);

A. On November 201, 2014, at the Defendant’s residence located in Ulsan-gu E 101, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, 200,000 won and purchased through the prior Internet site, the Defendant installed a down-to-face camera in the form of the hand-to-face system, and taken the victim’s body and telegraph exposed to the Defendant’s body and telegraph against the victim’s will.

Accordingly, the Defendant taken the body of the victim against his will, from that time to September 2015, by using the camera as above, which could cause sexual humiliation or sense of shameing, and taken the body of the victim over six times in total, such as the list of crimes (1) of the attached Table from September 2015.

B. On October 9, 2015, the Defendant sent a video recording on which the victim’s body body was exposed to F’s smartphones on the ground that the victim does not take part in F’s cellphones, on the ground that the victim does not take part in F’s cellphones.

Accordingly, the defendant has a camera or other similar function as above.

arrow