beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant, around 12:00 on June 28, 2013, undertaking to immediately repay the borrowed amount of KRW 400,000,00 from the date of the loan to the branch of DF E in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with the computer for the purpose of uttering, to pay the borrowed amount of KRW 400,000,000 on the title column, and to pay the borrowed amount of KRW 30% on the loan column in the content column. The Defendant, at the branch of DF in Gangnam-gu, promise to pay the borrowed amount of KRW 400,000,000 on the borrowed amount of KRW 30,00 from the date of the loan by the borrower, will be paid immediately at the branch of DF E in the event that the borrower did not pay the borrowed amount of KRW 30% on the borrowed amount of KRW 400,00,000 on the date of the loan.
The manager of 1.DF E branch on June 28, 2013 I, DF 1.D E branch manager I
2. The name of the Director of the Loan System A and the official seal of the Director of the DF E branch office shall be stamped next to the name of I, and the Defendant shall be stamped next to the Defendant’s name.
Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the “written promise of payment by subrogation for rent” in the name of the Director I of the Dong E branch office, which is a private document on rights and obligations.
2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, exercised the “written undertaking of payment by subrogation for rent” forged to J, a creditor of H, who is aware of the forgery, as described in Paragraph 1, as if it were the document duly formed.
3. From March 1, 2013, the Defendant has been engaged in business breach of trust while working as the director of the division of victim DF branch E in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
D Agricultural Cooperative, as a local agricultural cooperative, has a duty not to guarantee another person's obligations or to provide security in accordance with the Agricultural Cooperatives Act.
Nevertheless, at around 12:00 on June 28, 2013, the Defendant, without authority, borrowed KRW 350,000,000 from J in violation of the above occupational duties, DF E branch offices and DF E branch offices as described in paragraph (1).