logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.08.09 2017나972
손해배상(기) 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiff filed the same claim against the Defendant as indicated in the column for purport of the claim. The first instance court, among the instant forest land, cited the removal of the unit of a fishing place on the ground of 6 square meters on board, which connects each point of 59 square meters and 21, 22, 23, 24, and 21 square meters in the same drawing, among the forest land of this case, connected each point of 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 25 attached Table 1. The court of the first instance declared a judgment dismissing the remainder of the claim.

With regard to this, as stated in the purport of appeal, only the Plaintiff appealed and filed an appeal, and as in the statement in the statement in the purport of appeal, it is limited to the delivery of “bbbb” portion in the instant forest, and the removal of the above ground-based goods, and the removal of the above ground-based goods, which successively connect each point of the attached drawings 13, 14, 15, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 40, 39, 37, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 33, 32, and 13 of the instant forest, as shown in the annexed drawings 2 among the forest land in this case, and the Plaintiff’s claim is limited to the amount equivalent to KRW 1,23,4,5,67, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 10 of the instant forest land.

2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the part of the 10th to the 11th 5th eth eth eth th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth

3. Part 2 of the instant forest land: (a) The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) is the Defendant.

arrow