Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a woman’s clothes D operated by the Victim C from December 3, 2010 to May 31, 2014.

On May 31, 2014, the Defendant, at the above store around 13:20 on May 31, 2014, taken off sets in which the victim is in custody of the Kabterece.

The list of single-one customer recorded on the back part of the back part was teared, and its utility was impaired.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Attachment of damaged dathograph photographs), seizure records, list of seizure and investigation reports (Submission of materials by a complainants);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. The Defendant is a person who, from December 3, 2010 to May 31, 2014, worked in the female clothes D operated by the victim C from around December 3, 2010 to May 31, 2014.

A. On May 21, 2014, around 19:15, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the Defendant’s mother by way of sending the Defendant’s 109,000 white b, Seo-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, in a 141-do, the market value of the victim’s instant D stores in the amount of KRW 109,00,000, the market value of which is equivalent to KRW 109,000.

B. On May 26, 2014, the Defendant cut off one of the 169,000 won at the market price, which was owned by the victim at the same place in the same manner at the same time.

(c)

On May 29, 2014, around 19:42, at the same place, the Defendant stolen one hard-fluoring 169,000 won at the market price owned by the victim in the same manner, and one white fluor equivalent to 109,000 won at the market price.

2. Determination:

A. The defendant's defense counsel's dispatch of the store of this case to a door-to-door store as stated in the facts charged around 200 times is merely the defendant's clothes owned by the defendant and not the victim's clothing.

B. The instant clothes are listed in the instant “D” store.