1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From June 15, 2016 to June 27, 2016, the Plaintiff was engaged in an Amrape pipeing business at C Co., Ltd., Ltd. located in Gyeong-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, in an Amrope pipeing business.

1. Chemical steam pulmonary wastes;

2. Pulcopum pulmonary waste;

3. the right-hand tamps No. 1,2;

4. The Defendant filed an application for medical care benefits on the ground that both sides of the Maternal Maternal Maternals (the left side, the left side, the 1,2,3,4,5 Maternal Maternals (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Maternal Maternals") occurred

B. On March 6, 2017, the Defendant examined the Plaintiff’s medical history and radiation opinion and examined the Plaintiff’s medical opinion, and there is a medical opinion that the applicant’s injury and disease is called “pactocopy.” ② The applicant performed the contact work with respect to the pipe that has been annual 10 days, but it is confirmed that it is not waste by chemical steam, ③ the relationship with the applicant’s work performed by the applicant cannot be acknowledged due to infectious disease. ④ In light of this, there is no proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s injury and the Plaintiff’s injury and the Plaintiff’s injury and the Plaintiff’s injury and the Plaintiff’s injury and the Plaintiff’s injury and injury are not recognized.

For reasons, "the disposition of this case" is "the disposition of this case".

[The facts that there is no dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 6, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the waste collection of the Plaintiff was caused by a chemical steam generated due to the contact at an enclosed place, and during the treatment of waste collection, the occurrence of the collapse of both sides by the pulmonary blood and the combination thereof was generated. Although the disease of this case was related to the work, it was unlawful for the disposition of this case to deny this.

(b) (1) To be recognized as a disaster caused by an occupational reason under the Industrial Accident Insurance Act, work as well as work arising out of the work.