1. The Defendant’s KRW 70,357,980 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from October 6, 2016 to October 15, 2020 for the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a company that manufactures industrial machinery, etc., and the plaintiff entered the defendant company on November 1, 1995 and engaged in steel cutting and melting work at the production team.

B. On October 6, 2016, at around 17:05, the Plaintiff was in the process of manufacturing a structure of glass stude in the Defendant plant, while combining 7.5 cm labels at both sides of the above structure (weight of about 8-9 metric tons) and connecting 10 metrics with a sprinkler for 10 metric tons, the Plaintiff was in the process of causing an accident where the slot bell was cut and the structure was different, and the Plaintiff’s emission was shocked (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. On October 31, 2016, the Plaintiff suffered from the injury of the 1st to 4th of the left side of the instant accident to cut off the 1st of the instant accident, the upper part of the upper part of the satisfaction, the 1 to 3rd of the upper part of the satisfaction, the stalle of the upper part of the upper part of the satisfaction, the damage to both sides and the blood pressure failure, and the 2nd of the second part of the upper part. The Plaintiff was hospitalized several times until December 2017, and received the 4th of the upper part of the cut and the 4th of the left part.

The Plaintiff was paid KRW 43,280,820 as temporary disability benefits until February 15, 2018 due to the instant accident from Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service, and received disability benefits of KRW 66,648,540 as disability benefits, recognized as disability in class 8’s 00.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 8 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts, at the time of the accident of this case, the plaintiff was engaged in the work of putting heavy structures into a Belgium and a string, and in such a case, the defendant has sufficient seal labelings, and the defendant has selected an appropriate string labeling in advance according to the type and weight of the structure, check whether it has been abnormal, check whether it has been done, and guide and educate the plaintiff from time to time so that he does not work in close vicinity to the structure without safety measures at the time of the accident of this case.