logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.04.18 2016가단23840
임대보증금반환
Text

1. The defendant shall pay 35,000,000 won to the plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3. The costs of the lawsuit.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: To be as shown in attached Form of claims;

(However, the “creditor” is deemed to be the “Plaintiff”, and the “debtor” shall be deemed to be the “Defendant”). 2. Service by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

3. In addition, there is no assertion or proof as to the fact that the Plaintiff performed the obligation to return the leased object, which is simultaneously performed with the obligation to return the leased deposit, and the Plaintiff is a person who is living continuously in the leased house as of the date of pleading.

Thus, since the defendant's obligation to return the lease deposit was omitted due to the delay of the performance, the part of the claim for delay damages during the claim in this case is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow