logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2016.01.20 2015가단9385
임대차보증금 반환
Text

1. The defendant shall pay 68,000,000 won to the plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3. The costs of the lawsuit.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (Judgment without holding any pleadings due to the submission of a written reply);

3. There is a relationship between the duty to return the lease deposit and the duty to deliver the leased object of the lessee’s lease with the obligation to deliver the leased object of the lease. There is no assertion or proof as to whether the Plaintiff fulfilled the obligation to deliver the leased object of the lease to the Defendant or provided it. Therefore, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s obligation to return the lease deposit was delayed.

Therefore, we cannot accept the part of the plaintiff's claim for damages for delay.

arrow