logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2020.04.22 2019고단1674
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

A is a person who operates a marina business with the trade name of "D" in SP at all times, and the defendant B is the head of the above business.

Defendants from January 2019 to the same year

3. From July 1, 200 to July 200, female employees E (E, towing: F), G (G, towing: H) with the nationality of Thailand in addition to the amount of maths from customers, in the case of act of similarity, 30,000 won in cash (in the case of card settlement), in the case of sexual intercourse, 50,000 won in cash (in the case of card settlement, 70,000 won) in the case of sexual intercourses, the said female employees engaged in the act of similarity or sexual intercourse by means of making the said female employees quickly embling the sexual flag of customers or scing them under the above below.

As such, the Defendants conspired to act as a broker for commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. An interrogation protocol of a police officer regarding E (an interpretation protocol);

1. Each statement of E, G, and I;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Application of employment certificate, business registration certificate (D), fare list, copy of business account, card receipt, lodging report management ledger, real estate lease contract, card transaction details, and statutes on site photographs;

1. The Defendants: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with labor

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A of a community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Reasons for sentencing: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, the former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [the prosecutor requested the confiscation even with respect to subparagraphs 15 and 16 of the seized evidence, but the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor is insufficient to recognize that each of the above seized material constitutes subject to confiscation];

1. Scope of punishment by law: One to seven years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines (the determination of types) shall be at least 19 years of age.

arrow