logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.10.10 2012가합3894
대여금등
Text

1. The service mark, telephone number, etc. listed in the attached Form 1 List against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) B among the principal lawsuit of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

Reasons

Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant C”) was a law firm established on July 21, 1989, including the status of a party to the premise facts, and Defendant B served as a representative attorney-at-law from October 24, 1990 to July 12, 2004, and was reappointed on February 25, 2009.

The plaintiff worked as a member attorney-at-law from May 28, 1999 to September 30, 200, and was dismissed, but he joined the defendant corporation and was employed as a representative attorney-at-law from March 2, 2006 to February 25, 2009, and withdrawn on March 16, 2009.

On June 30, 2009, the defendant corporation passed a resolution for dissolution at the members' meeting to appoint the defendant B as a liquidator, and on July 13, 2009, the registration of dissolution has been completed.

On March 13, 2009, the Plaintiff established and operated a personal law office under the trade name of “F”, and used a mark identical or similar to the service mark listed in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant service mark”), such as the signboards of the said office, the inner and external decorations and the joints of the said office, and the joints of the said office, including postal bags, “G”, “H, I”, “J”, “F”, and “K” (hereinafter “instant service mark”).

At the time Defendant B resigned from the representative attorney-at-law office on July 12, 2004, Defendant B agreed to be paid KRW 150 million per month from July 2004 to December 2004 and KRW 50 million per month from July 2004 to December 2004.

On February 22, 2006, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with Defendant B to acquire the shares of Defendant B so that the Plaintiff may be appointed as a representative attorney-at-law. After the agreement, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement to ensure that Defendant B and the Defendant D, the wife of Defendant B, who is the wife of Defendant B, will make a lifelong payment of KRW 50 million per month, and entered into an agreement on this.

On July 2007, the Plaintiff agreed to adjust the monetary reward to Defendant B as KRW 30 million per month between Defendant B and the monetary reward to Defendant D, and the monetary reward to be paid to Defendant D, which is KRW 20 million per month.

arrow