beta
Text
1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff is a law firm with the purpose of conducting the duties of an attorney-at-law, patent attorney, notary public, etc., and was established on July 21, 1989, and on June 30, 2009, a resolution for dissolution was passed at the members’ meeting on July 13, 2009, and the registration of dissolution was completed on July 13, 2009. 2) D served as the Plaintiff’s representative attorney from October 24, 1990 to July 12, 2004, and was appointed as the Plaintiff’s representative attorney again from February 25, 2009 to June 30, 2009.
3) The defendant served as the plaintiff's member attorney-at-law from May 28, 1999 to September 30, 200, and served as the plaintiff's representative attorney-at-law from March 2, 2006 to February 25, 2009, and from March 13, 2009, opened and operated a private legal office with the trade name "C". (B) The plaintiff reported to the Ministry of Justice as to the approval of the amendment of the articles of incorporation and the change of members (e.g., withdrawal of attorney-at-law E) around December 26, 2008, the Ministry of Justice accepted the above report on December 26, 200, and the plaintiff is comprised of at least 15 of the members of the former Attorney-at-Law Act (amended by Act No. 10627, May 17, 201) as the plaintiff's representative attorney-at-law from March 13, 2009.
(2) Any law firm shall, if it fails to meet the requirements for partner under paragraph (1), fill the vacancy within three months.
Since the reason for revocation of authorization is the reason for revocation of authorization, it was notified that one recruitment is necessary until March 23, 2009.
2. On April 15, 2009, the Ministry of Justice notified the Plaintiff of the date of holding a hearing before revoking the authorization of the law firm. On April 22, 2009, the Plaintiff sent to the Ministry of Justice a notice of the Plaintiff’s failure to meet the Plaintiff’s constituent requirements, i.e., the date of holding the hearing on April 27, 2009.