1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the owner of the C large 492 square meters in Ansan-si, and the Defendant is the owner of the D large 605 square meters and its ground storage, which is the neighboring land, and since the warehouse owned by the Defendant was built by the Plaintiff, the Defendant was built by breaking the above C land owned by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s claim is to remove the part of the bed warehouse

2. We find that there is no evidence to acknowledge that the building owned by the Defendant was in violation of the boundary of the land of 3 large 492 square meters in Ansan-si owned by the Plaintiff, and rather, according to the result of the survey and appraisal by appraiser E (a survey technician belonging to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport in the Gyeonggi-do Headquarters of the Korea National Land Information Corporation), a warehouse owned by the Defendant is only a fact that the warehouse owned by the Defendant was constructed on the ground of D’s land,

3. If so, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the burden of litigation costs is to be borne by each party on the basis of an agreement at the conciliation date on March 20, 2018. It is so decided as per Disposition.