logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2016.07.22 2016고단246
공용물건손상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the above fine is not paid, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 High Order 833] On January 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim’s singing practice room at the victim C’s window B located in the window B at Chang-si, Chang-si; (b) 1 punishment on the market value, which is the victim’s ownership in the singing practice room at which the victim was locked; and (c) 270,000 won in cash.

[2016 Highest 246]

1. On January 29, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of “F” from the main point of “F,” located in “F,” and the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and did not go to the said main point. Upon receiving a report that the Defendant did not go to the main point, the security guards, and security guards of the police station G police box assigned to the police station G police box called the Defendant and sent out, and recommended him to return to the Republic of Korea, and the Defendant recommended him to go out of the police station, and the Defendant saw the Defendant to walk back the after-up of the patrol vehicle parked on his own, and the security guards avoided the Defendant, and the Defendant entered the police officer’s left hand.

As above, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case and the protection of the host.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the same time and place as above 1.3, at the same time, and at the same place, and after the left side of the J, which is used by the G police box of the 112-strawing Police Station, damaged the Defendant to walk the tail, etc. to the right edge of the Defendant, thereby impairing the Defendant’s repair cost of KRW 65,300.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 order 833]

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each on-site photograph [2016 Height 246];

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. The 112 reported case handling table; and

1. A motor vehicle inspection and maintenance report;

1. Each related photograph;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of estimates to vehicles for repeated crimes as stated in the judgment);

1. Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and the application of the statutes on investigation reports (Attachment to the judgment);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act that interferes with the performance of official duties as stated in the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and the judgment of the choice of punishment: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty) is decided.

arrow