A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On December 8, 2015, the Defendant purchased aviation tickets of an amount equivalent to KRW 2,206,40,00 at the market price by telephone at an aviation office for the victim Co., Ltd. from Songpa-gu Seoul and 2.507, the Defendant was a customer of the Defendant.

Along with D’s new card number, validity period, and password number of the credit card (E) of the new bank in the name of D obtained from D, the said airline employee, without D’s permission, informed the said airline employee of the information, obtained economic benefits equivalent to the above amount by allowing the said airline employee to enter the said credit card information into the airline ticket payment system and to make the payment of the purchase price of the said airline tickets. From around that time to January 6, 2016, the said employee obtained financial benefits equivalent to the above amount by allowing the said airline employee to make a payment for the purchase price of the airline tickets by allowing the said airline employee to pay the purchase price of the airline tickets. Around that time, from the time to January 6, 2016, the said employee obtained financial benefits equivalent to KRW 23,722,700 in total at the market price by allowing

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written statements prepared by D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each investigation report;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 347-2 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes are that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case by using credit card information from his customer, and the nature of the crime is not good. The defendant has a record of being notified three times of summary order due to the fraud of the same kind of law, the amount of damage is not significant, and the defendant recognizes and reflects his mistake, and other sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship to victims, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc. are considered within the sentencing criteria.